"A photograph can be an instant of life captured for eternity that will never cease looking back at you." ~ Brigitte Bardot
In the past in this weblog, I've recounted some of the facts about my past. I was able to separate myself from the memories--dissociate--and describe my life without emotion. I'm really good at that; I've had a lot of practice. I'm going to try to go back now and talk about how it felt. Be forewarned. It did not feel good.
There aren't many photographs of me. I generally make sure I'm the person holding the camera because I don't like to have photos taken. Occasionally, when forced, when to do otherewise would be misinterpreted, I do my best to smile. I try to stand still and hope it's over soon. It's a little bit like abuse in that way.
The earliest photo I have of myself is when I was just a bundle. My paternal grandmother was holding me in her arms. She still had black hair then. I wasn't visible at all. My favorite kind.
The next photo I still have is when I was around two or three. It must have been just after we moved to Texas because I was decked out in bitty cowboy boots and a cowboy hat. My mother is holding me in her arms and she's wearing this beautiful white wool dress. In all other important respects, the circumstances were exactly the same as they would be in every photograph ever taken while I lived with my parents.
My father had just come over and hit my mom several times, while she was holding me. My memory of that photograph is how angry I was and yet, if you were to see it, you would never guess. I'm looking off into the distance, away from my mother and away from the camera held by my father. Only one of my hands is clenched. I seem to be bemused. I had already learned to dissociate.
Every photograph ever taken of me leads me back to that learned emptiness. I'm smiling, with tears in my eyes, because my father has just come over to hit me. Sometimes he hit me several times. You know, I just wasn't smiling right. I always wondered why he took those photos, what he thought they would conjure up for me in the distant future.
It was like a ritual. Invariably, I would have to be dressed in whatever outfit was newest. My mom had to have my hair curled. Sometimes some makeup was applied. Then the fun began. If he weren't dead, I would ask him about his memories of those pictures. I would ask him if it still made him feel big and powerful to look at the tears in my eyes. I didn't cry in all of them because I was generally so adept at feeling nothing that I could smile anyway. There are a couple, though, when the torture session had been going on for an extended period of time, that you can see some faint trace of emotion.
Fortunately, very few photos of me still exist. I don't know what happened to them. Maybe there just were never many taken, thought that would be unusual for an only child. Maybe over the years, they were forgotten in old houses when we left or thrown away. jI think those explanations reflect the reality of my life. Mostly I was forgotten and my childhood thrown away when I was inconvenient for the adults who ruled my life. I was perpetually inconvenient.
Of course, after I grew up, I had photos taken by friends. There was no one there to hit me. Nonetheless, that brief moment before the shutter clicked, I was always miserable. I never look at the camera. The damage was already done long ago. I no longer needed anyone to hit me because I had been so thoroughly schooled in a special kind of self loathing evoked only by a camera.
I hide those few childhood photos extant even from myself. When I can bear to look at them or when I'm forced to look at them, they make me want to cry. I'm sorry for that little girl. I try hard never to look at them because crying over the past never did me any good. No matter how many tears I shed, there will never be enough to wash away the anguish. I have a distinct distaste for the camera lens.
America held hostage day 1330
Bushism of the day;
"Some communities, you say, "Hey, American dream," and they go, "What does that mean?"
Source: FDCH Political Transcripts, "George W. Bush Participates in Manchester, New Hampshire Welcome," Oct. 5, 2002
Website of the day; Mystic Radio
http://www.mysticradio.com
26 May 2005
25 May 2005
Toilets, Marriage and Lunacy
The right to marry whoever one wishes is an elementary human right compared to which "the right to attend an integrated school, the right to sit where one pleases on a bus, the right to go into any hotel or recreation area or place of amusement, regardless of one's skin or color or race" are minor indeed. Even political rights, like the right to vote, and nearly all other rights enumerated in the Constitution, are secondary to the inalienable human rights to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence; and to this category the right to home and marriage unquestionably belongs. [Dissent, Winter 1959] ~ Hannah Arendt
The plumber has been working on the restroom next door to me. God only knows what he's doing in there, but it sounds like he's ripping everything out and starting over. Now he's talking to Crazy Employee, the admin person, who called him to come out. Like she wants the technical details of why the toilet keeps overflowing. Let's see now, at $85.00 an hour, I'm guessing it's going to require a lot of explaining. I ran into him one other day when he was working on the same toilet. In the past year they've installed about 20 of those flapper thingies. Here's a thought: Buy more expensive flappies.
I have one co-worker, Mr. Moneybags (the Comptroller), who has now hired both of his children. I'm just waiting for the wife to show up because I know she's having some kind of crisis at her job. I don't mind, of course. I'm just waiting for the inevitable nuclear meltdown. That ought to be entertaining. I ended up having a conversation with this colleague this morning. I'm usually successful in avoiding getting trapped with Mr. M., but this morning we were talking about the NBA game last night when he segued into gay marriage. Why. Is this what keeps him awake at night? Several years ago, he told me that he was taking a "personal stand" against homosexuality. He said it like he was so proud of himself for embracing such an unpopular stance. Yeah, like no one else in this country has an irrational hatred for gay people. I'm still dying to know what taking a personal stand looks like. How does he manifest that decision? By whining to me about it?
Anyway, he's all worked up about the gay marriage issue. He thinks the courts are forcing legislators to enact laws requiring gay marriage. I just skipped over that entirely and pointed out to him that prohibiting marriage between members of the same sex is, in fact, discrimination. Appealing to logic, I pointed out to him that, if you just substitute the word "gay" with the words "black person" or "Hispanic person," everything would be abundantly clear to him. He suggested to me that it would be fine with him if they had a civil union, but marriage is only for men and women. Give me a fucking break.
What the hell is the difference between a civil union and marriage? Gay people aren't going to destroy the institution of marriage as we know it. Straight, married people are. I doubt that I need to point out the incredibly high incidence of divorce. I'm not current on the numbers of married people having affairs, but I'm sure it's still a fairly popular sport. In my opinion, it's none of the state's business whom I choose to bond with. I chose not to marry for 18 years, even though I was living monogamously with one man (now my husband) the entire time. I married him because of economic incentives. I still hold the opinion that the government should just butt the fuck out of my private life.
But I digress. I had to just move the conversation in a different direction before my head exploded and Mr. M. found himself covered in brain matter. Then he started talking about the compromise worked out by moderates of both parties, which prevented the fillibuster option from being taken off the table permanently. It just makes me far too weary to even recount that episode of "Talking with a Lunatic." Suffice it to say, I made an exit as soon as I possibly could. I've been holed up in my office for hours now. I'll be coming out at 5:00.
Have I mentioned lately how much I love my job?
America held hostage day 1329
Bushism of the day:
# "One year ago today, the time for excuse-making has come to an end."
Source: Federal News Service, "Remarks by President George W. Bush on Anniversary of No Child Left Behind Act," Jan. 8, 2003
Website of the day: L.A. Times Crossword
http://www.latimes.com/features/puzzles/crosswords/
The plumber has been working on the restroom next door to me. God only knows what he's doing in there, but it sounds like he's ripping everything out and starting over. Now he's talking to Crazy Employee, the admin person, who called him to come out. Like she wants the technical details of why the toilet keeps overflowing. Let's see now, at $85.00 an hour, I'm guessing it's going to require a lot of explaining. I ran into him one other day when he was working on the same toilet. In the past year they've installed about 20 of those flapper thingies. Here's a thought: Buy more expensive flappies.
I have one co-worker, Mr. Moneybags (the Comptroller), who has now hired both of his children. I'm just waiting for the wife to show up because I know she's having some kind of crisis at her job. I don't mind, of course. I'm just waiting for the inevitable nuclear meltdown. That ought to be entertaining. I ended up having a conversation with this colleague this morning. I'm usually successful in avoiding getting trapped with Mr. M., but this morning we were talking about the NBA game last night when he segued into gay marriage. Why. Is this what keeps him awake at night? Several years ago, he told me that he was taking a "personal stand" against homosexuality. He said it like he was so proud of himself for embracing such an unpopular stance. Yeah, like no one else in this country has an irrational hatred for gay people. I'm still dying to know what taking a personal stand looks like. How does he manifest that decision? By whining to me about it?
Anyway, he's all worked up about the gay marriage issue. He thinks the courts are forcing legislators to enact laws requiring gay marriage. I just skipped over that entirely and pointed out to him that prohibiting marriage between members of the same sex is, in fact, discrimination. Appealing to logic, I pointed out to him that, if you just substitute the word "gay" with the words "black person" or "Hispanic person," everything would be abundantly clear to him. He suggested to me that it would be fine with him if they had a civil union, but marriage is only for men and women. Give me a fucking break.
What the hell is the difference between a civil union and marriage? Gay people aren't going to destroy the institution of marriage as we know it. Straight, married people are. I doubt that I need to point out the incredibly high incidence of divorce. I'm not current on the numbers of married people having affairs, but I'm sure it's still a fairly popular sport. In my opinion, it's none of the state's business whom I choose to bond with. I chose not to marry for 18 years, even though I was living monogamously with one man (now my husband) the entire time. I married him because of economic incentives. I still hold the opinion that the government should just butt the fuck out of my private life.
But I digress. I had to just move the conversation in a different direction before my head exploded and Mr. M. found himself covered in brain matter. Then he started talking about the compromise worked out by moderates of both parties, which prevented the fillibuster option from being taken off the table permanently. It just makes me far too weary to even recount that episode of "Talking with a Lunatic." Suffice it to say, I made an exit as soon as I possibly could. I've been holed up in my office for hours now. I'll be coming out at 5:00.
Have I mentioned lately how much I love my job?
America held hostage day 1329
Bushism of the day:
# "One year ago today, the time for excuse-making has come to an end."
Source: Federal News Service, "Remarks by President George W. Bush on Anniversary of No Child Left Behind Act," Jan. 8, 2003
Website of the day: L.A. Times Crossword
http://www.latimes.com/features/puzzles/crosswords/
24 May 2005
Friday
We only regard those unions as real examples of love and real marriages in which a fixed and unalterable decision has been taken. If men or women contemplate an escape, they do not collect all their powers for the task. In none of the serious and important tasks of life do we arrange such a "getaway." We cannot love and be limited. ~ Alfred Adler
Friday turned out to be pretty grim. I spent an hour on the phone with my daughter in law, listening to her talking about her marital problems. You know, I hate to sound like Barbara Bush, but I'm not sure it's appropriate for her to talk with me about it. I mean, I'm not exactly unbiased. I'm not inclined to give advice under any circumstances. Furthermore, she shared information about their sex lives. I mean, would you talk with your step mother in law about having sex with her stepson? I wouldn't do it. I'd find a friend or a therapist or something. Too icky.
My daughter in law asked me to call so that she could get to know me better. Note to self: When all known behavior demonstrates narcissim, be clear that she is not interested in getting to know you.
When I got home after therapy on Friday, my dog was hypoglycemic. He hadn't been up all day. I felt terrible. I don't think he was in danger, but he certainly could have been. I gave him some honey and a piece of meat and he was ready to get up and go for a walk. It's become clear to me that I'm going to have to educate myself about canine diabetes, because my vet isn't very helpful.
I know that doesn't sound earth shaking, but there are other things I'm too tired to take up at the moment.
America held hostage day 1328
Bushism of the day:
"What is life choices about?" —Bush, speaking to student athletes
Source: Federal Document Clearing House, "President Welcomes NCAA Champs," Feb. 24, 2003
Website of the day: Virtual Bubble Wrap
http://www.virtual-bubblewrap.com/
Friday turned out to be pretty grim. I spent an hour on the phone with my daughter in law, listening to her talking about her marital problems. You know, I hate to sound like Barbara Bush, but I'm not sure it's appropriate for her to talk with me about it. I mean, I'm not exactly unbiased. I'm not inclined to give advice under any circumstances. Furthermore, she shared information about their sex lives. I mean, would you talk with your step mother in law about having sex with her stepson? I wouldn't do it. I'd find a friend or a therapist or something. Too icky.
My daughter in law asked me to call so that she could get to know me better. Note to self: When all known behavior demonstrates narcissim, be clear that she is not interested in getting to know you.
When I got home after therapy on Friday, my dog was hypoglycemic. He hadn't been up all day. I felt terrible. I don't think he was in danger, but he certainly could have been. I gave him some honey and a piece of meat and he was ready to get up and go for a walk. It's become clear to me that I'm going to have to educate myself about canine diabetes, because my vet isn't very helpful.
I know that doesn't sound earth shaking, but there are other things I'm too tired to take up at the moment.
America held hostage day 1328
Bushism of the day:
"What is life choices about?" —Bush, speaking to student athletes
Source: Federal Document Clearing House, "President Welcomes NCAA Champs," Feb. 24, 2003
Website of the day: Virtual Bubble Wrap
http://www.virtual-bubblewrap.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)